Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 19:26

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Do you think your landlord should have a key to your room?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Space photo of the week: Pink 'raindrops' on the sun captured in greatest detail ever - Live Science
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Have you ever regretted not hitting on a older women?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
With 2026 World Cup a year away, the USMNT is directionless - Yahoo Sports
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Latest on WWE’s Saudi plans after Iran attacks U.S. base in Qatar (Updated) - Cageside Seats